apartment for sale, 3 rooms - Pärnu mnt 82, Uus Maailm, Kesklinn, Tallinn, Harjumaa

PANE TÄHELE!

Apartment ownership, stone house

Kitchen: electric stove, refridgerator, kitchen furniture
Sanitary arrangements: shower, bath, washing machine
Heating and ventilation: heated floors, central heating
Communications and security: Internet, phone, cable TV, video cameras, steel door, frontdoor locked, security system
Additional information: TV-set, packet windows, parquet, lift, box-room, wall cupboard, high ceilings

Automatically translated Show original

MAJAHALDUR: KORTERELAMU ON ÜLEÜLDISELT HALVAS SEISUKORRAS, KOHATI KRIITILISES SEISUS!
AUDITI KOKKUVÕTE: HOONE ON SUHTELISELT HALVAS SEISUKORRAS JA VAJAB KIIREMAS KORRAS RENOVEERIMIST. ERAKORRALISE AUDITI DOKUMENT ON 10 LEHEL, MILLES KAJASTATUD EHITUSTEHNILISE ÜLEVAATUSE ALUSEL KOOSTATI NIMEKIRI PUUDUSTEST, 27 PUNKTI AVARIITÖID JA 18 PUNKTI REKONSTRUEERIMISE ETTEPANEKUID.
Korteriühistu (juhatus) on põhjustanud vara väärtuse vähenemise, sest ei ole taganud vara säilimist (hoone seisund halveneb ajas), vajalikke töid ei ole tellitud või on tellitud ja teostatud mitte-vastavalt, ei ole kasutanud (vt RKTKo nr3-2-1-116-11 p 23, https://www.riigikohus.ee/et/lahendid/?asjaNr=3-2-1-116-11) kohaseid õiguskaitsevahendeid ega avaldanud algdokumente kuidas on raha ära kasutatud. Samal ajal on kinnisvaraettevõtjast juhatuse liige ja tema raamatupidajast abikaasa seotud ehitusettevõtjaga, kes on kriminaalkorras süüdi tunnistatud pistise (altkäemaksu) andmises ja konkurentsi kahjustavate kokkulepete ja kooskõlastatud tegevuste toimepanemises ehitus- ja remonditööde hangete läbiviimisel, ehitus- ja remonditööde teostamisel PERH, Tabasalu Ühisgümnaasiumi ja MTÜ Harjumaa Ühistranspordikeskus korraldatud ehitus- ja remonditööde hangetel (vt HMKo kuriteoasi nr1-18-2452, https://www.riigiteataja.ee/kohtulahendid/fail.html?fid=237295419). Korteriühistus on konfliktid nii liikmete ja juhatuse vahel kui ka juhatuses.
Käesolevaga on avaldatud asjaolud, mille vastu on korteriomandi ostjal VÕS § 14 lg 2 esimese lause tähenduses äratuntav oluline huvi, seejuures müüdava korteriomandi tavaliseks omaduseks loetakse ka VÕS § 217 lg 2 p 2 tähenduses seda, et korteriomandit majandatakse nõuetekohaselt (vt nt RKTKo nr3-2-1-43-15 p 17, https://rikos.rik.ee/?asjaNr=3-2-1-43-15).

BUILDING MANAGER: THE APARTMENT BUILDING IS GENERALLY IN BAD CONDITION, SOMETIMES IN CRITICAL CONDITION!
AUDIT SUMMARY: THE BUILDING IS IN A RELATIVELY BAD CONDITION AND NEEDS RENOVATION URGENTLY. THE EXTRAORDINARY AUDIT DOCUMENT CONTAINS 10 PAGES IN WHICH, ON THE BASIS OF THE CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL INSPECTION, A LIST OF DEFICIENCIES, 27 EMERGENCY WORKS AND 18 RECONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS WAS COMPILED.
The apartment association (board) has caused a decrease in the value of the property, because it has not ensured the preservation of the property (the condition of the building deteriorates over time), the necessary works have not been ordered or they have been ordered and carried out in a non-compliant manner, they have not used them (see RKTKo no. *-*-*-*** -** d 23, https://www.riigikohus.ee/et/lahendit/?asjaNr=3-2-1-116-11) and did not publish the original documents on how the money was used. At the same time, a member of the management board who is a real estate entrepreneur and his accountant husband are related to a construction entrepreneur who has been criminally found guilty of giving a bribe (bribery) and committing agreements and concerted activities that harm competition in the procurement of construction and repair works, construction and repair works of PERH, Tabasalu Ühisgymnaasium and MTÜ Harjumaa Construction and repair work tenders organized by the Public Transport Center (see HMKo criminal case no. *-**-****, https://www.riigiteataja.ee/kohtulahendit/fail.html?fid=237295419). The apartment association has conflicts both between the members and the board, as well as within the board.
The circumstances in which the buyer of the apartment property has a recognizable significant interest within the meaning of the first sentence of § 14 subsection 2 of the VÕS are hereby published, while the fact that the apartment property is properly managed is also considered as a normal property of the apartment property being sold within the meaning of § 217 subsection 2 p 2 of the VÕS (see e.g. RKTKo no. *-* -*-**-** p 17, https://rikos.rik.ee/?asjaNr=3-2-1-43-15).